Показати скорочений опис матеріалу
dc.contributor.author | Сарапін, Віктор | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-04T15:34:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-04T15:34:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sarapin V. Emergency Services 2.0 : Master’s thesis : (073 “Management”) / Ukrainian Catholic University. Chair of Management and Organizational Development. - Lviv: UCU, 2019. - 58 p. | uk |
dc.identifier.uri | https://er.ucu.edu.ua/handle/1/4244 | |
dc.language.iso | en | uk |
dc.subject | Emergency Services | uk |
dc.title | Emergency Services 2.0 | uk |
dc.type | Preprint | uk |
dc.status | Публікується вперше | uk |
dc.description.abstracten | The project describes considerations to create and operate emergency services that can cope with current and future demands, driven by population growth and city infrastructure lagging behind. Current arrival time for medical emergency services should be under 10 minutes within city limit and under 20 minutes beyond city limit for emergency cases. Depending on meteorological conditions, road condition, season etc. it may be extended by additional 10 minutes[1]. Considering round-trip this means that for emergency case beyond city limit in case of extended timing 1-way reaction time is already 30 minutes and round-trip is 60 minutes - which is already an upper boundary for medical reaction time for emergency cases (should be under 60 minutes) - if this timing is exceeded, chances to get irreversible damage to patient health grow significantly[2]. Short-term results of the project is bringing real number of emergency calls to capacity of services, thus gaining reliable improvement of reaction time and provide case of success for regional healthcare services. Long-term results of the project is have sustainable cost-effective emergency service with service level meeting or exceeding community expectations, with potential to be the growth point of low-infrastructure on-demand transportation system. My motivation for the project consists of several larger items: first was to dive into area way far from pure software engineering and deal with something that involves extensive hardware component. Second was to work in aerospace domain, which was an interest since while ago. Third was to deal with local healthcare infrastructure and get clearly visible improvement – and one of the most visible would be emergency services: o exist interviews in my company the most common case for leaving the company was relocation to another country, due to better healthcare for the person leaving the company and his or her kids, and better education system for the kids. Education is somewhat aside from my experience, but healthcare was exactly it – so I 5 decided why not to do something about it. This project is already second initiative in this area. | uk |