Denial of Human Superiority over Nature as the Denial of the Value of Nature

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yarema, Mariya
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-04T11:35:46Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-04T11:35:46Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.issn 1733-1218
dc.identifier.uri https://er.ucu.edu.ua/handle/1/2994
dc.language.iso en uk
dc.subject
dc.subject environmental ethics
dc.subject stewardship of nature
dc.subject ecological myths
dc.title Denial of Human Superiority over Nature as the Denial of the Value of Nature uk
dc.type Article uk
dc.status Опублікований і розповсюджений раніше uk
dc.description.abstracten Ecology as a science today, mainly rejects anthropocentrism in favour of nonhuman-centred ethics. Such rejection is propagated as a proper valuing of nature, while the human-centred eco-theories are considered to be the theoretic basis for the exploitation and destruction of nature by humans. The main purpose of some nonhuman-centred ecologic theories is to reduce the growth of the human’s population because the people’s existence, totally, is seen as a cause of ecological disasters, and even social problems. The aim of the article is to show that human beings are, in reality, the only living organisms on Earth, able to take care about nature as it deserves. The main problem is incorrect behaviour with nature, not a big amount of people living on the Earth. The ecological disasters, at the same time, are connected not only with humans’ irresponsible conduct, but with the natural forces that are independent from human activity, but that does not deprive people from the task to take responsibility for their environmental behaviour. uk
dc.relation.source Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 2021, 19, 4 uk


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account